COMPLIANCE HAS RISK. A database with this much personal information is a prime target and without robust and constant scrutiny will fail.
Re: Bill S-210
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2025 3:36 pm
by al_keda
Dr Strangelove wrote: Sun Jul 27, 2025 2:50 pm
A single point of entry sounds good but when the info gets hacked and it is mandatory to register isn't this the gun registry all over again?
I didn't submit to the gun registry, and I won't to this either.
The only websites with the financial capacity to work around the government’s new regulations are the ones causing the problems in the first place.
It makes it harder for adults to access perfectly legal (and often helpful) information and services. It forces people to create detailed trails of their online activity linked to their real identities. It drives users toward less secure platforms and services. It destroys small online communities that can’t afford compliance costs. And it teaches an entire generation that bypassing government surveillance is a basic life skill.
Working as intended
Re: Bill S-210
Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:25 pm
by al_keda
Bypassing government surveillance is required in a free society.